Enrique A. Bour
A Repository of selected papers in Economics, Mathematical Economics, Social Sciences and Philosophy
Main Menu
Home
Vita
Courses / Assistants
Books
Articles
Working Papers
Links Repository
- - - - - - -
Index of Authors
Index of Institutions
- - - - - - -
Photo Gallery
Contact me
Search
Students' News

17/4 Metodología I
Programa 2017

22/3 Microeconomía II
Alumnos 1er Cuatrimestre

28/2 Microeconomía II
Programa 1er Semestre

Statistics
Documents: 157
Links: 11909
Authors: 7668
Institutions: 379

Online users: 5500
Visitors: 60916355
Since Nov 9, 2004 

 
Corrupción: Hacia un Enfoque Teórico y Empírico
By Enrique A. Bour, August 2011, presented at the XLVI Reunión Anual de la Asociación Argentina de Economía Política, November 2011, Universidad de Mar del Plata.

This article pertains to a larger treatise in Law of Economics directed by Juan Sola and prefaced by Nobel prize Edmund S. Phelps. The JEL classifies corruption under the heading of Public Organizations. Why? We begin by following the suggestions by Vito Tanzi. Corruption has been increasingly studied recently by many scholars, -- Cheung, Rose-Ackerman, Schenone, Canavese, etc. Corruption has many negative effects on the economic welfare of nations, as well as on the morale of its citizens. We follow Schenone and Gregg in their characterization of corruption from the point of view of theology, as well as Hardin and Elinor Ostrom in the property rights implications of the “tragedy of the commons”, up to Canavese who clearly exposes how the dual tragedy of the “anti-commons” (Heller) can be used to explain the amount of corruption in a society. A theorem by Canavese underlines that the punishement of corruption may give place to a worse resource allocation that the absence of punishement; that the organized crime may be preferable to the disorganized one; and that competitivity between potentially corrupt agents may prevent the effects of corruption on resource allocation. We end this article by pointing to some econometrics done with corruption (throughout the article we emphasize several cases of measurement of corruption at the world level and some resonant cases of corruption in the recent history of Argentina). The presentation includes an extension of these points.

Download article
Download presentation


Other links:
Comentarios a la Ponencia de Enrique Bour
By Enrique García Viñuela, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, presented at the XLVI Reunión Anual de la Asociación Argentina de Economía Política, November 2011, Universidad de Mar del Plata
Respuesta a los comentarios
By Enrique A. Bour, presented at the XLVI Reunión Anual de la Asociación Argentina de Economía Política, November 2011, Universidad de Mar del Plata.



< Prev   Next >

 

 
2004-2017 © Enrique Bour